[user=19996]Paul S[/user] wrote:
[quote]Agreed, ,i also wish theyd tell us;
Brake fluid (1.8)
Additional braking device performance (1.5)
Daytime running lamps (4.2)
Front fog lamps (4.5)
Reversing lamps (4.6)
Bumpers (6.1.4)
Prop shafts (6.1.7)
All rear drive shafts (6.1.7)
Cab security (6.2.2)
Cab steps (6.2.8)
Floors (6.2.4)
Passenger hand grips (quads and heavy trikes only) (6.2.12)
Noise suppression material (8.1.1)
Undertray security (6.2.1)
Emission control equipment (8.2)
• Oxygen sensor (8.2.1.1)
• NOx sensor
• Exhaust gas recirculation valve (8.2.1.1)
• Other emission control equipment
Engine Malfunction indicator lamp (8.2.1.2)
DPF tampering (8.2.2)
Fluid leaks – engine, transmission etc (8.4.1)
cause one saying ‘structurally’ weakened in reference to prescribed area is a tad ott
[img]http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article7284209.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Vauxhall-Corsa-skids-on-ice-and-smashes-through-familys-living-room-window.jpg[/img]
Stealth how am i supposed to explain to presenter the significantly reduced structural strength of their motor?[/quote]
Paul, I’ll take it that customer was not happy with your test result, driving it through your front window 😀
